"Burton Busk" <burtonlmb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9qGdnZu5A9X7K4HVnZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "musicaner" <musicaner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:c846934f-829e-4f50-99bf-3780a3d91a99@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> the ESTREET BAND is the band for BRUCE forget all the rest of em.
>> thats it.
>> and the next project by BRUCE will be with em. thats the way the
>> little red ball bounces.
>
> You mean new recordings without Danny? I'd be surprised, but happy.
>
>> just enjoyed the BRUCE show last night
>
> You went to the show? Any particular highlights?
>
> and i do beleive the ESTREET is
>> the band for him,
>
> It is, but he likes to mix it up in some fa****on.
>
> dont even think of gettin them banjo folk back in
>> there!
>
> I think ol Bruce got his heart set on it; I'd be surprised if we didn't
> see more with them, if not this year, then next. Actually next year's
> probably more likely, if he intends to tour some with it. And if there
is
> another E Street allbum this year, push a Sessions Band album back to
> 2010.
I know I'm the lonesome voice in the wilderness, but there are some
aspects
to the SSB that I like a whole bunch. Not so wild on the "Old Dan Tucker"
stuff, but
I liked what they did with some of Springsteen's songs ("Further Up the
Road" and "American Land" and such).
If he wrote a whole album...spared the covers of songs we learned in grade
school...I could go for that.
Or if he does go with covers, I hope he goes with material such as "How
Can
a Poor Man Stand Such Times and Live,"
since he made it seem current and took a haunting, old recording, updated
it
to the point where he made it his own.
|
