Re: AC/DC pics both nights

> So you're saying it's your preference for AC/DC to always remain a 
> greatest hits nostalgia act with monolithic setlists and arrangements
that 
> never, ever change?
> When they did the Roseland gig, that was obviously for the benefit of 
> their diehards. You think that was a bad thing?

1- Bads, you know better than to put words in someone else's mouth.  I
meant 
what I said.  I didn't say the entire setlist should never, ever change. 
What I said was I enjoy that they mostly play "greatest hits" because a) 
they've got a ton of them and b) I love it when the crowd is going nuts 
around me.  I also take a lot of non die-hards with me to the shows, and 
it's very clear that they have more fun with the greatest hits.  So yes, I

prefer that their big shows remain big shows.

2- Obviously not.  But that was a very rare event.  Their current tour
shows 
that they can't/won't do small venues.  So in the big venues, you have a 
choice of lots of rare songs and dead crowds, or lots of hits and fired-up

crowds.  Personally, again, I'd go with the 45,000 other fans in Toronto.

AC/DC is about playing to the crowd.  Roseland is the exception that
proves 
that rule.  In a perfect world everyone would push DC to play a varied 
setlist, and love them all as much as I do.  But in reality, I'll take a 
jacked-up crowd over an obscure song 9/10 times.

TV