Re: Fecking bicycle folk ..

"Dinsdale Pirana" <Dinsdale@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:18o574pgt93siqc91jd69nc43dl4qocsh5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:36:51 GMT, "RainbowWarrior"
> <anemailadress@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in aus.general:
>
>>"Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:1OKdnRGeHNBQue3VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> "Dinsdale Pirana" <Dinsdale@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:he3074hi7shnkvldf7e9tbeaflid5p9cdm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:27:54 +0000 (UTC), Kaizer Solzay
>>>> <oobi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in aus.general:
>>>>
>>>>>Maybe it's time to make people who want to ride bicycles on public 
>>>>>roads
>>>>>have a form of registration which includes taking part in a
>>>>>motorcycle-style
>>>>>training course before being allowed to have a 'license'?
>>>>
>>>> Same old chestnut. Most adults who ride bicycles on the road also
have
>>>> a car.motorcycle licence.
>>>
>>> Most??
>>> Having anything to back up that claim?
>>
>>Is there anything to back up the claim most people who ride bicycles 
>>haven't
>>got licences? Or are we counting kids? Then again I suspect lately fewer
>>kids can ride bikes than adults.
>>
>
> No, the original statement was that most ADULTS who ride bicycles also
> have a car or motorcycle licence. The stats bear this out.

And you were asked for a cite for these 'stats', which you miserably
failed 
to provide.

-- 
Kwyj.