Re: Fecking bicycle folk ..

Kwyjibo <kwyjibo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dinsdale Pirana" <Dinsdale@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:18o574pgt93siqc91jd69nc43dl4qocsh5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:36:51 GMT, "RainbowWarrior"
>> <anemailadress@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in aus.general:
>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:1OKdnRGeHNBQue3VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> "Dinsdale Pirana" <Dinsdale@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:he3074hi7shnkvldf7e9tbeaflid5p9cdm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:27:54 +0000 (UTC), Kaizer Solzay
>>>>> <oobi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in aus.general:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it's time to make people who want to ride bicycles on
>>>>>> public roads
>>>>>> have a form of registration which includes taking part in a
>>>>>> motorcycle-style
>>>>>> training course before being allowed to have a 'license'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Same old chestnut. Most adults who ride bicycles on the road also
>>>>> have a car.motorcycle licence.
>>>>
>>>> Most??
>>>> Having anything to back up that claim?
>>>
>>> Is there anything to back up the claim most people who ride bicycles
>>> haven't
>>> got licences? Or are we counting kids? Then again I suspect lately
>>> fewer kids can ride bikes than adults.
>>>
>>
>> No, the original statement was that most ADULTS who ride bicycles
>> also have a car or motorcycle licence. The stats bear this out.
>
> And you were asked for a cite for these 'stats',

You're lying, as always.

> which you miserably failed to provide.

You're lying, as always.