Talk About Network

Google





Music > Afro-Latin Music > Re: Crypto: if ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 5 Topic 2516 of 2864
Post > Topic >>

Re: Crypto: if occupancy is the justification!!!

by "Ø" <Ø@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 20, 2008 at 09:15 PM

"Dennis M Reed \"Califa\"" <dmreed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> 
> "Ø" <Ø@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:Xns9AC2ECBCC8084c54s0l1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Dennis M Reed \"Califa\"" <dmreed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> hey Crypto, as usual, you provide the very argument needed to counter 
>>> your
>>> own comments regarding the Palestinians and Palestine.
>>>
>>> you claimed that the Palestinians had a right to the land they
>>> occupied in
>>> 1948 because they were there and not providing any historical right to
>>> the
>>> land.
>>>
>>> therefore, the Israelis have a right to that same land NOW because
>>> they occupy the land NOW!
>>
>> Therefore, dumbass, the 'Israelis' HAVE *NO RIGHT* TO KEEP STEALING
>> PALESTINIAN LAND. THAT IS WHAT IS HAPPENING, IT'S NOT THE OTHER WAY 
>> AROUND.
> 
> you are so full of it...your own logic counters what you use as an
> argument for Palesitinal rights to the land...your logic relies on
> squatter's rights and the Israelis are the current squatters!

In terms of "squatters", then: Those 'Israelis' who still have not stolen 
land from Palestinian squatters who have been there much longer are aiming
to 
STEAL that land from the Palestinian squatters who have been there.
That is a CRIME. We are witnesses to a crime and I'm not going to be
silent 
on it.
The Palestinian squatters NEVER got us involved in any wars. They NEVER
had 
their brethren INFILTRATE the US govt, media and take control to sup****t 
their agenda. The Palestinian squatters were living peacefully planting
olive 
trees and such. The Russian mob and the Rothschilds want to take that area

over. I'm sure they've got their greedy sights on the Patagonia area in
South 
America. That'll probably be next.

I'd rather have peaceful olive growing squatters, than a bunch of war-mad,

blood-thirsty genocidal yahooweh's there, creating enemies for us.
They need their Amalek. Now they want their Amalek to be MY Amalek and I
tell 
them in no uncertain terms: I *WON'T* ACCEPT YOUR PSYCHOTIC WORLD VIEW!
I *won't* sup****t the wars you create.




>>
>> *That* is what the unwashed, filthy rabbi demanded from Bush when he 
>> handed
>> Bush that scroll. He demanded ALL of that land.
>> The JEWS are ethnic cleansing the MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS.
>> It's NOT the other way around, no matter how many Islamic bogeymen the 
>> Judeo-
>> Masonic media creates.
>>
> and did the rabbi get all the land? 

This, of course, is a work in progress. Did you expect it to be done the
next 
day?

> BTW have you provided any proof that
> the rabbi is unwashed? 

No. 
He looked unwashed in that pic.

> ritual wa****ng is part of some Jewish practices.

I've heard what you say and I've heard otherwise. At least for the ultra-
orthodox.
I have no proof of this. 
At this time it is not unfair to consider this as a "smear".  

 
> name-calling only shows how limited your capabilities are regarding 
> presentation of arguments.

Once you get past the name-calling there's substance there.
The name-calling is in a way a test. If you can cross that barrier, then 
you're strong enough to see the substance. If the name-calling turns you
off, 
you will NEVER see the substance behind it. It's a fence only the strong 
climb. 
The weak are unwanted here.
They can chatter about Obama, Hillary or Osama's "latest". 
Then they think they've done their "political duty" and can watch s****ts
or 
soaps. Politically-correct people will not cross the barrier.
People who follow "Abraham Hicks" and much of the new-age movement are 
probably not wanted.
BTW, it would appear that I'm part of a movement, but I'm not.


> 
> I have to admit that I do not recall any mistakes in formal logic which
> are identified by shouting and name-calling but it is obvious that you
> have tried to master these techniques!

You have mastered the clueless technique. I sometimes don't post for you.
I post for others who may be reading this.


>>
>>
>>>
>>> thanks, for providing us with an appropriate argument you cannot
>>> oppose because it is the argument you yourself used!
>>
>> Thanks for helping me make my point.
>> I had to shout because you're deaf, dumb and blind.
>>
> shouting does not make you correct....it just makes you loud and
> obnoxious and more obviously defenseless regarding all you various
> claims which you cannot prove.

What have you been doing in your subject lines?

Ø
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Crypto: if occupancy is the justification!!!
"Dennis M Reed \&quo  2008-06-18 19:28:07 
Re: Crypto: if occupancy is the justification!!!
"Ø" <Ø@[EMAI  2008-06-20 06:16:20 
Re: Crypto: if occupancy is the justification!!!
"Dennis M Reed \&quo  2008-06-20 11:29:03 
Re: Crypto: if occupancy is the justification!!!
"Ø" <Ø@[EMAI  2008-06-20 21:15:31 
Re: Crypto: if occupancy is the justification!!!
"Dennis M Reed \&quo  2008-06-20 15:33:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 22:03:12 PST 2009.