"Ø" <Ø@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns9AC3910CB2AEc54s0l1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Dennis M Reed \"Califa\"" <dmreed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ø" <Ø@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9AC2ECBCC8084c54s0l1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Dennis M Reed \"Califa\"" <dmreed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hey Crypto, as usual, you provide the very argument needed to counter
>>>> your
>>>> own comments regarding the Palestinians and Palestine.
>>>>
>>>> you claimed that the Palestinians had a right to the land they
>>>> occupied in
>>>> 1948 because they were there and not providing any historical right
to
>>>> the
>>>> land.
>>>>
>>>> therefore, the Israelis have a right to that same land NOW because
>>>> they occupy the land NOW!
>>>
>>> Therefore, dumbass, the 'Israelis' HAVE *NO RIGHT* TO KEEP STEALING
>>> PALESTINIAN LAND. THAT IS WHAT IS HAPPENING, IT'S NOT THE OTHER WAY
>>> AROUND.
>>
>> you are so full of it...your own logic counters what you use as an
>> argument for Palesitinal rights to the land...your logic relies on
>> squatter's rights and the Israelis are the current squatters!
>
> In terms of "squatters", then: Those 'Israelis' who still have not
stolen
> land from Palestinian squatters who have been there much longer are
aiming
> to
> STEAL that land from the Palestinian squatters who have been there.
> That is a CRIME. We are witnesses to a crime and I'm not going to be
> silent
> on it.
the point is that you have provided no justification for the Palestinians
except that they were squatting there...you have not said who the took the
land from or where they came from themselves...so if the Israelis are the
new squatters on the partitioned Palestine, so what?
> The Palestinian squatters NEVER got us involved in any wars. They NEVER
> had
> their brethren INFILTRATE the US govt, media and take control to sup****t
> their agenda. The Palestinian squatters were living peacefully planting
> olive
> trees and such. The Russian mob and the Rothschilds want to take that
area
> over. I'm sure they've got their greedy sights on the Patagonia area in
> South
> America. That'll probably be next.
nice statement...got any proof of their peaceful living?
>
> I'd rather have peaceful olive growing squatters, than a bunch of
war-mad,
> blood-thirsty genocidal yahooweh's there, creating enemies for us.
> They need their Amalek. Now they want their Amalek to be MY Amalek and I
> tell
> them in no uncertain terms: I *WON'T* ACCEPT YOUR PSYCHOTIC WORLD VIEW!
> I *won't* sup****t the wars you create.
>
your obvious cuteness regarding the name(s) of God(s) shows your total
disrespect...not all Jews are Israelis and yet you belittle their God.
to the best of my knowledge, I have not created any wars.
>
>>>
>>> *That* is what the unwashed, filthy rabbi demanded from Bush when he
>>> handed
>>> Bush that scroll. He demanded ALL of that land.
>>> The JEWS are ethnic cleansing the MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS.
>>> It's NOT the other way around, no matter how many Islamic bogeymen the
>>> Judeo-
>>> Masonic media creates.
>>>
>> and did the rabbi get all the land?
>
> This, of course, is a work in progress. Did you expect it to be done the
> next
> day?
>
>> BTW have you provided any proof that
>> the rabbi is unwashed?
>
> No.
> He looked unwashed in that pic.
oh? and that proves he is unwashed? by the tone of your posts it is
obvious
that your are covered with fecal matter and proves that your
great-great-great-grandfather was indeed a bastard! what kind if logic is
that? it is the kind you try to foist off on us in virtually every post.
>
>> ritual wa****ng is part of some Jewish practices.
>
> I've heard what you say and I've heard otherwise. At least for the
ultra-
> orthodox.
> I have no proof of this.
it is obvious that you do not do research on your own and only parrot what
your handlers tell you.
> At this time it is not unfair to consider this as a "smear".
>
>
>> name-calling only shows how limited your capabilities are regarding
>> presentation of arguments.
>
> Once you get past the name-calling there's substance there.
> The name-calling is in a way a test. If you can cross that barrier, then
> you're strong enough to see the substance. If the name-calling turns you
> off,
> you will NEVER see the substance behind it. It's a fence only the strong
> climb.
name-calling is indeed a test, a test of reasonable debate, and you have
constantly failed that test!
> The weak are unwanted here.
> They can chatter about Obama, Hillary or Osama's "latest".
> Then they think they've done their "political duty" and can watch s****ts
> or
> soaps. Politically-correct people will not cross the barrier.
> People who follow "Abraham Hicks" and much of the new-age movement are
> probably not wanted.
> BTW, it would appear that I'm part of a movement, but I'm not.
>
the only movement I can see you belonging to and fitting in with begins
with
a "b"!
(BTW because your meager intellect might misconstrue what I meant...bowel
movement is the only movement in which you might fit...and is definitely
the
one in which you wallow constantly...I guess that makes you a filthy
unwashed anti-Jew racist pig...get it....pig wallow!)
>
>> I have to admit that I do not recall any mistakes in formal logic which
>> are identified by shouting and name-calling but it is obvious that you
>> have tried to master these techniques!
>
> You have mastered the clueless technique. I sometimes don't post for
you.
> I post for others who may be reading this.
>
when I asked if anyone cared about your posts, a single response was post
and it said no one cared what you had to say! I was also criticized for
responding to your posts.
>
>>>> thanks, for providing us with an appropriate argument you cannot
>>>> oppose because it is the argument you yourself used!
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping me make my point.
>>> I had to shout because you're deaf, dumb and blind.
>>>
>> shouting does not make you correct....it just makes you loud and
>> obnoxious and more obviously defenseless regarding all you various
>> claims which you cannot prove.
>
> What have you been doing in your subject lines?
>
showing some of the various lies and falsehoods and inuendos you have
tried
to dump on us!
|
