"firefly" <fireflyguy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:TkLAj.11975$Mw.994@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <comicsfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:b4318030-668c-409b-9778-7985c561078d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Recordings of "I'll Follow The Sun" date back to 1960; is this is the
>> earliest recording of a Lennon/McCartney (or McCartney/Lennon) song
>> that would be released on their Beatles LPs?
>>
>> And more im****tantly -- because it leads to discussion -- does anyone
>> know why THIS particular song was the one they went back to in 1964?
>> Certainly other songs were left behind ("One After 909" being the most
>> obvious), and there were lots of songs given away in between. Was
>> their any suggestion from the Beatles as to what makes *this* one
>> particularly special?
>
> I'll Follow The Sun is a beautiful song with certain dynamics. Melody,
> construction, material: It has a story and a feeling that has the
dignity
> to
> live.
>
> The One After 909 is garbage.
>
> I will never understand, for the rest of my life, how the Beatles' trash
> gets the most talk and airplay.
>
> ---firefly
>
Come to think of it though, maybe the simpler songs are the less
threatening
to less creative minds...
---firefly
--
All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup,
please
change your headers appropriately. -- the moderators
--
|
