Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Music > Beatles Moderated > George's bloody...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 14 Topic 534 of 589
Post > Topic >>

George's bloody wah wah

by eviltimeban <r_crosbie@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 24, 2008 at 09:18 AM

One thing I've noticed having listened to quite a lot of Get Back
tapes and outtakes etc, is that the instruments generally sound pretty
bad. Paul's bass, because its the old Hofner, is light and thuddy with
no real bass end. John's guitar has the same muffled tone throughout
the whole sessions, Ringo's drums are flat and dead sounding, and
George just will not get off his wah wah pedal.

I wonder how they could've thought what they were playing sounded
good. Or maybe they didn't. If the live concert had gone ahead, would
it have been a mess? Or would they have pulled it together like on the
rooftop?

For musicians with multiple guitars etc, its a wonder they didn't try
out different sounds for different songs. Or at least tell George to
give the wah wah a rest for about five minutes! Its only when they get
on the pianos and acoustic do things start to sound nice, certainly in
Twickenham; at Apple the electric stuff didn't sound too bad.

Just my random thoughts this morning...!

--

All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated. 
  
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup,
please 
change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators
--
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
George's bloody wah wah
eviltimeban <r_crosbie  2008-04-24 09:18:37 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Jeff <yourimageunreels  2008-04-24 12:42:40 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
iarwain <iarwain_8@[EM  2008-04-24 13:23:28 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Crisstti <crissttigald  2008-04-24 15:46:06 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Nil <rednoise+news@[EM  2008-04-24 18:51:04 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Chuck Anderson <websit  2008-04-25 19:49:10 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Adam <look@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-26 07:11:36 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
"RichL" <rpl  2008-04-26 09:40:50 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Nil <rednoise+news@[EM  2008-04-26 13:22:19 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
"O'Leary III" &  2008-04-27 05:43:10 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Tom1W@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-24 18:51:53 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
brilton <notlirb@[EMAI  2008-04-24 20:11:00 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Crisstti <crissttigald  2008-04-25 19:52:03 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
"RichL" <rpl  2008-04-25 19:52:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 11:22:38 CST 2008.