Talk About Network

Google





Music > Beatles Moderated > Re: George's bl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 14 Topic 534 of 595
Post > Topic >>

Re: George's bloody wah wah

by "RichL" <rpleavitt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 25, 2008 at 07:52 PM

eviltimeban <r_crosbie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> One thing I've noticed having listened to quite a lot of Get Back
> tapes and outtakes etc, is that the instruments generally sound pretty
> bad. Paul's bass, because its the old Hofner, is light and thuddy with
> no real bass end. John's guitar has the same muffled tone throughout
> the whole sessions, Ringo's drums are flat and dead sounding, and
> George just will not get off his wah wah pedal.
>
> I wonder how they could've thought what they were playing sounded
> good. Or maybe they didn't. If the live concert had gone ahead, would
> it have been a mess? Or would they have pulled it together like on the
> rooftop?
>
> For musicians with multiple guitars etc, its a wonder they didn't try
> out different sounds for different songs. Or at least tell George to
> give the wah wah a rest for about five minutes! Its only when they get
> on the pianos and acoustic do things start to sound nice, certainly in
> Twickenham; at Apple the electric stuff didn't sound too bad.
>
> Just my random thoughts this morning...!

Remember, this is around a time when the wah pedal first began to be
popularized by the likes of Hendrix, Clapton, and Page.  In that
context, it's not surprising that George wanted to experiment with it.

--

All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated. 
  
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup,
please 
change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators
--
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
George's bloody wah wah
eviltimeban <r_crosbie  2008-04-24 09:18:37 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Jeff <yourimageunreels  2008-04-24 12:42:40 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
iarwain <iarwain_8@[EM  2008-04-24 13:23:28 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Crisstti <crissttigald  2008-04-24 15:46:06 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Nil <rednoise+news@[EM  2008-04-24 18:51:04 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Chuck Anderson <websit  2008-04-25 19:49:10 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Adam <look@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-26 07:11:36 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
"RichL" <rpl  2008-04-26 09:40:50 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Nil <rednoise+news@[EM  2008-04-26 13:22:19 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
"O'Leary III" &  2008-04-27 05:43:10 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Tom1W@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-24 18:51:53 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
brilton <notlirb@[EMAI  2008-04-24 20:11:00 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
Crisstti <crissttigald  2008-04-25 19:52:03 
Re: George's bloody wah wah
"RichL" <rpl  2008-04-25 19:52:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 22:46:18 PST 2009.