Jeff <yourimageunreels@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 12:32 am, "O'Leary III" <'kwr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Jeff wrote:
>>> On the first post in this thread, it was mentioned that
>>> with Paul, there was no bass end. I remember seeing in the film that
>>> Paul was also using a Fender Bass Amp. I remember those being very
>>> popular during the late 60's, like the custom amps. Today, those
>>> amps sound horrible compared to what Bass players use these days.
>>> Do you remember what other bass amps were popular back then.
>>
>> Ampeg.
>
> "69," that far back? I bought a bass Ampeg in "73" or "74". It was a
> hassle. I always needed help to haul the damn thing..moving it in the
> back seat of a car.
>
>
> --
>
> All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup
> rec.music.beatles.moderated. If your follow-up more properly belongs
> in the unmoderated newsgroup, please change your headers
> appropriately. -- the moderators
Oh sure. I think I saw my first Ampeg amp in 1964, when a guy that we
knew came over and jammed with my band. He had a wonderful-sounding
Ampeg amp (not a bass amp), a real echoplex, and a Gibson 335. It was
my first direct exposure to real pro gear (we were using Silvertone amps
at the time).
--
All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup,
please
change your headers appropriately. -- the moderators
--
|
