On Apr 26, 7:12 am, "RichL" <rpleav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Jeff <yourimageunre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 12:32 am, "O'Leary III" <'kwr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Jeff wrote:
> >>> On the first post in this thread, it was mentioned that
> >>> with Paul, there was no bass end. I remember seeing in the film that
> >>> Paul was also using a Fender Bass Amp. I remember those being very
> >>> popular during the late 60's, like the custom amps. Today, those
> >>> amps sound horrible compared to what Bass players use these days.
> >>> Do you remember what other bass amps were popular back then.
>
> >> Ampeg.
>
> > "69," that far back? I bought a bass Ampeg in "73" or "74". It was a
> > hassle. I always needed help to haul the damn thing..moving it in the
> > back seat of a car.
>
> Oh sure. I think I saw my first Ampeg amp in 1964, when a guy that we
> knew came over and jammed with my band. He had a wonderful-sounding
> Ampeg amp (not a bass amp), a real echoplex, and a Gibson 335. It was
> my first direct exposure to real pro gear (we were using Silvertone amps
> at the time).
I think we used the silvertone and a magnatone. (sp?)
--
All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup,
please
change your headers appropriately. -- the moderators
--
|
