Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Music > Acoustic Guitar > Re: 0-16ny
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 30 Topic 22094 of 23353
Post > Topic >>

Re: 0-16ny

by "Kevin Hall" <timberline@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 12, 2008 at 09:54 AM

Ed;

The 0-16 NY model was very lightly built by 'modern' standards,   and
really 
not intended for steel strings.   Odd little things actually.   If I 
remember rightly,  and it's been about 30 years since I repaired or played

one,   they had only one tone bar down between the lower legs of the 'X', 
like the very early small bodied Martins built before they switched to
steel 
strings in the early 1920s.

The model was originally intended as a sort of 'dual-s****t' rig on which
you 
could use either nylon or silk-'n-steel strings.   Steel strings any
heavier 
than extra-lights will damage them in short order.

They're definitely not meant as a flat-picking thrasher,  and frankly 
they're just not that good as an all-rounder either.

I did a few gigs back about 1968 or '69 with a woman who had one,  and it 
was drowned by my 00-18.  The woman was a member of the Canadian Olympic 
gymnastic team at the time.   Wonder what happened to her and the little 
guitar?

Anyway,  if you want a good all 'round 12-fret slothead Martin,  try
finding 
a 00-21 instead,  or an early 0 or 00-18.

KH
"Ed Edelenbos" <eded@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:6dqg8dF3se06U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Who's played one?  Whudja think?  How would one hold up to moderate to 
> hard strumming (i.e no style or finesse)?
>
> Where's one in decent shape (for sale)?
>
> Ed
>
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-11 21:38:19 
Re: 0-16ny
Larry Pattis <NeverHer  2008-07-11 19:26:37 
Re: 0-16ny
Norman Draper <normand  2008-07-11 20:47:16 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 00:36:05 
Re: 0-16ny
Larry Pattis <NeverHer  2008-07-12 06:55:08 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 10:57:19 
Re: 0-16ny
Larry Pattis <NeverHer  2008-07-12 08:37:08 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 12:23:45 
Re: 0-16ny
Larry Pattis <NeverHer  2008-07-12 09:26:30 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 12:32:08 
Re: 0-16ny
Matt Hayden <meh1963@[  2008-07-12 14:36:42 
Re: 0-16ny
Larry Pattis <NeverHer  2008-07-12 14:59:14 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-13 18:34:35 
Re: 0-16ny
Matt Hayden <meh1963@[  2008-07-14 19:34:44 
Re: 0-16ny
Tony Weber <mycroftxxx  2008-07-11 19:30:58 
Re: 0-16ny
Misifus <rafseibert@[E  2008-07-11 23:18:03 
Re: 0-16ny
"Tom from Texas"  2008-07-12 10:35:33 
Re: 0-16ny
guitarbench <tan.teren  2008-07-12 06:42:45 
Re: 0-16ny
"Kevin Hall" &l  2008-07-12 09:54:32 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 11:12:36 
Re: 0-16ny
Larry Pattis <NeverHer  2008-07-12 08:38:12 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 11:49:38 
Re: 0-16ny
"don hindenach"  2008-07-12 12:24:36 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-14 15:59:49 
Re: 0-16ny
"Tony Done" <  2008-07-13 23:32:50 
Re: 0-16ny
"Kevin Hall" &l  2008-07-14 21:10:16 
Re: 0-16ny
ksternberg1@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-07-12 08:06:13 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-12 11:51:56 
Re: 0-16ny
Dan Kozar <f9a@[EMAIL   2008-07-12 22:32:51 
Re: 0-16ny
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-13 19:32:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 13:22:27 CST 2008.