Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Music > Acoustic Guitar > Re: Passive Bre...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 14 Topic 22104 of 23490
Post > Topic >>

Re: Passive Break-In Device

by JimLowther <JimLowther@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 14, 2008 at 11:26 AM

On Jul 14, 11:06=EF=BF=BDam, Alan D. <SPAMNOTa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Alan D. <SPAMNOTa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >"David L. Martel" <marte...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>Jim,
>
> >> =EF=BF=BD That would vibrate the top. I'd be surprised if the bridge
h=
oles are
> >>spaced the same on all guitars so I think your device would only work
o=
n a
> >>specific guitar or model.
> >> =EF=BF=BD I'm not sure I follow the reason for the special gizmo, Why
=
not park the
> >>guitar near a speaker? Put on some Montoya and turn it up. Less
efficie=
nt
> >>maybe but much easier.
> >> =EF=BF=BD There was an acoustic amplifier that had a sound board
inste=
ad of a paper
> >>cone speaker. Perhaps that transducer would be better than a speaker
ma=
gnet.
>
> >>Dave M.
>
> >There are multiple forms of this type of breakin. Some use the
speaker(s=
) and
> >blast it in an acoustic box, sometimes called Shaker Tables with
various
> >theories as to what should be played, other just remove the speaker
cone
> >material leaving the voice coil and attach a "stinger" to the coil.
This=
 then
> >is pressed againt, or attached, to the bridge to drive it. An
interestin=
g
> >variant is a system of excentric weights on a small motor which is then
> >attached to the strings to drive the box. Different weights are used
ove=
r a
> >series of days to excite the various modes. Contact Edward Dick
> >(evd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) or Greg German (g...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) for more
on=
 this
> >last method.
>
> >All that being said, whether this helps or is all just in the ear of
the
> >beholder is still a hotly disputed area. I don't have a dog in that
figh=
t so
> >no
> >comment from my corner. Still, interesting concept. I could blather on
a=
t some
> >length but I'll spare you (heh, heh)
>
> >Alan D.
>
> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD(Geeezzz! I really need to get a Usnet poster program
=
with a spell chequer. )- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Me, too!
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
Passive Break-In Device
JimLowther <JimLowther  2008-07-13 18:23:22 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
phizappakrappa@[EMAIL PRO  2008-07-13 23:28:30 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
"David L. Martel&quo  2008-07-14 08:39:37 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
Alan D. <SPAMNOTalan@[  2008-07-14 15:00:15 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
Alan D. <SPAMNOTalan@[  2008-07-14 16:06:45 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
John Sorell <j.sorellC  2008-07-14 16:34:56 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
"Ed Edelenbos"   2008-07-14 12:46:40 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
jgoska@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-14 08:46:01 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
alcarruth <alcarruth@[  2008-07-14 10:11:38 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
dick thaxter <dthaxter  2008-07-14 11:16:20 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
JimLowther <JimLowther  2008-07-14 11:24:06 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
JimLowther <JimLowther  2008-07-14 11:25:55 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
JimLowther <JimLowther  2008-07-14 11:26:10 
Re: Passive Break-In Device
JimLowther <JimLowther  2008-07-14 23:59:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 13:48:12 CST 2008.