Re: Question re degrees of the scale (and my intro to this group)

"Neil" <nhmiller@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:dd74f12e-635f-4aef-a369-30c12e34bc32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Feb 25, 3:02?pm, "Steve Latham" <llat...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Jack Campin - bogus address" <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
> messagenews:bogus-DF4E18.07564025022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Neil <nhmil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Fifth relation****ps matter for some music some of the time but
> > have nothing to do with the basic concept of "scale".
>
> And interestingly, I seem to have learned all my scales without having
to
> worry about whether they were derived from 5ths or not.
>
> Steve

Steve, please remove your message then post it again without it
looking like like I wrote this:
> Fifth relation****ps matter for some music some of the time but
> have nothing to do with the basic concept of "scale".

I completely disagree with that.

.... and then I'll remove this message.

Thanks,
Neil

It's obvious you disagree with Jack's statement. Anyone who's followed the

thread realizes you didn't write the line I was responding to, but Jack
did. 
But, for clarification:

Jack Campin wrote:

 Fifth relation****ps matter for some music some of the time but
> > have nothing to do with the basic concept of "scale".


To which I responded:

 And interestingly, I seem to have learned all my scales without having to
> worry about whether they were derived from 5ths or not.

Sorry for the quotation confusion.

Steve