Re: What's the relation****p between scales and chords?

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:11:26 -0800 (PST), LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Feb 27, 7:08 pm, Joey Goldstein <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Joey Goldstein wrote:

>You could do this, but wait! You say that this author gave you non
>standard information, you understood it at the time, but later it
>somehow seemed convoluted and yet, because there were little gems in
>it that things are not as standardized as I think? I think your
>convolution is still hanging around. The point of the whole thing is
>that your quoted book by Delamont is NOT standard. It is a flawed and
>incomplete approach. Was this a book used in your school? or did you
>stumble on it thumbing through the library? You got started with a non
>standard book! you just explained this to us? Now this is a valid
>reason to say that the basic method taught in most every music theory
>class in good schools is NOT standard?

What *are* you going on about, really? It's clear to me, and to anyone
who can understand simple English, that the poster understands with
utter clarity the difference between Delamont and the subsquent texts
he encountered. You're imagining things.

>  Joey, you are so close. Too
>bad if you can't make that last little jump to understand the truth of
>the matter. I hope that you can see it, you seem to actually try, but
>early misconceptions are really hard to ignore.

You can get really patronising and condescending when you think you're
on top. And you're the bloke who likes to pontificate about newsgroup
behavior. It's not a good look. It's the worst of all possible sins:
nagging. Stock STANDARD nagging.