Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Music > Music Theory > Re: Perceived l...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 40 Topic 2212 of 2512
Post > Topic >>

Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis

by "Steve Latham" <llatham@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 4, 2008 at 10:53 PM

"Joey Goldstein" <joegold@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:cc59db79-2445-4612-9378-549b1d08ea78@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> The inversions are a good point
>
> Does an analysis need to consider them?

>>IMO, not usually.
>>But when an inversion does affect the harmonic function it's a good
>>idea to mention that someway.


How do you mention it in those cases?


> In CPP analysis, we do, so any symbol that doesn't include inversion
> information is no good.
>
> So IIm to represent a ii chord in first inversion isn't helpful.
>
> Dm/F is helpful, but it obviously lacks the "non-note specific" elements
> that we use numerals for in the first place.

>>Like I said earlier, the jazz analysis would usually have the chord
>>symbols present as well, just like a classical analysis usually has
>>the notation present.

Oh - I see what you meant now - no, actually, we don't always have the 
notation present - in many cases, it's simply Roman Numerals, especially
in 
writings. Sometimes examples are included, but that's kind of the whole 
point about RN - and more especially now, UC/LC, is that you can define 
everything except the number and voicing of the upper notes. You've got
the 
root, the quality, the inversion, and if you know the key, that also tells

you the bass note specifically, and the other chord tones generically. We 
know that if it's 4 parts and root position, the root will be doubled, and

if its 6/4 the 5th will be doubled (exceptions in either case exits) and
in 
many things, we know some other specifics, like if we have V7-I, we know
the 
7th of the V7 will go down to the 3rd of the I chord (in virtually all 
cases) and the remaining voices (since we know the bass) become almost 
inconsequential. In many cases, you will see things like "to harmonize 
^3..." so we even know the soprano note - and in that case, it's
practically 
tablutare without the rhythm notation version - we can make assumptions
that 
are fairly accurate about everything - not that we need to take it that
far.

Now, of course it is nice to have a notated example, and hopefully, the 
actual example from which the analysis is drawn, but often enough, there
are 
no graphics to go along with the numerals.

Steve
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-02 12:09:18 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-02 18:56:47 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-02 14:59:48 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-02 20:41:25 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-02 19:55:21 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-04 19:31:56 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
ian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (p  2008-03-03 08:44:22 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-03 09:50:10 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
ian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (p  2008-03-04 01:28:40 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-03 21:49:53 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
ian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (p  2008-03-04 05:37:50 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-04 22:39:16 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-04 22:31:15 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-02 18:27:23 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-04 18:35:24 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-02 22:00:26 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-03 11:53:31 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-04 01:03:42 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <joegol  2008-03-04 14:21:26 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-04 22:53:47 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-04 20:14:37 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-10 17:49:24 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-10 20:33:33 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-11 17:59:42 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <joegol  2008-03-04 14:27:16 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-04 22:58:02 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-04 20:05:52 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-06 00:48:16 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
"Steve Latham"   2008-03-10 17:43:39 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-10 20:31:17 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-08 19:56:26 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-10 16:23:02 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-02 20:36:12 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-03 00:21:32 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-03 00:39:01 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
ian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (p  2008-03-03 06:12:45 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
Joey Goldstein <nospam  2008-03-03 01:16:35 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
ian@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (p  2008-03-03 07:14:53 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-04 00:46:28 
Re: Perceived limitations of using UC RN in an harmonic analysis
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-03-04 00:52:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 9:13:50 CST 2008.