Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Music > Music Theory > Re: Unanswered ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 67 Topic 2247 of 2432
Post > Topic >>

Re: Unanswered Question #1

by Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 4, 2008 at 01:07 AM

On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:23:02 GMT, "Steve Latham" <llatham@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
>"Danny Schorr" <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:qg99v31ppqot9n0j8nh9hj4asbk3oqhm8j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> I'd use Modal interchange usually to account for, among other things, 
>> minor
>> iv in major. You see that often in rock and pop, even blues. For
instance:
>
>Most texts use the term "Mode Mixture" to account for notes, or harmonies

>that appear in one mode (i.e. Major) being uses in the PARALLEL mode
(i.e. 
>minor). Cm being used instead of C Major in a piece in G Major, like
"When 
>September Ends" is an example of Mode Mixture.

You're right - I was replying to the basic idea, and was loose with the
terminology. But I didn't think it matted that much. In my mind they were
all referring to "Mode Mixture", which is the term Piston uses.
>
>I also hear the term "borrowed" notes or chords as well. Unfortunately,
this 
>term is also used in association with Secondary (Applied) chords as well
- 
>for instance, V/V is sometimes called a "borrowed chord" - the chord has 
>been borrowed from the key of the Dominant.

Is "applied" the standard term used for secondary dominants in academia? I
have never seen the term, but it's an interesting idea - that the
Secondary
Dominant is applied to the following chord. Just curious - that's a new
one
to this autodidact.
>
>I think most authors see "borrow" in this context as being a little to 
>generic of a term - yes, both of those types of "foreign" notes are being

>"borrowed". Thus, many use more specific terms to make a distinction
between 
>Mode Mixture Chords and Secondary Chords.

I can understand that.
>
>In early music, in modal systems, the concept of Mode Mixture is not 
>typically used as it seems to be descriptive of a CPP stylistic device. 
>Instead, "mutation" tends to be used, as in Hexachordal Mutation.

>
>Modal Interchange seems to be a newer term (or at least, I've only 
>encountered it more recently) used in "modern" modal contexts such as
Jazz 
>or other modal music, where, rather than borrowing from Parrallel modes
of 
>a single Key, notes are "interchanged" from one mode to another, with the

>same "tonic" note. So, in a work that's primarily in C Dorian, we might 
>encounter a few Ab notes. The explanation for these would typically be
that 
>they were being borrowed from C Aeolian (unlees there were some other 
>functional reason for their existence).
>
>However, conceptually, Mode Mixture and Mode (Modal) Interchange seem to
be 
>relatively synonymous. The former I typically hear associated with Tonal 
>works though, and the latter with works in extended tonality, etc. etc..

Good points. Thanks.

Danny
>
>Steve 
>
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-02 16:36:36 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Neil <nhmiller@[EMAIL   2008-04-02 22:02:21 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-03 09:52:44 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-03 20:23:02 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-04 01:07:45 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-04 16:02:56 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-05 10:37:27 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-05 16:22:27 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Tom K." <tk  2008-04-05 13:29:10 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-03 10:55:59 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"David Webber"   2008-04-05 20:44:16 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-06 12:22:53 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Tom K." <tk  2008-04-06 11:02:40 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-06 15:17:24 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-07 06:18:50 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-08 03:20:59 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-08 03:38:19 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-08 05:00:31 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"David Webber"   2008-04-08 08:28:05 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-08 20:07:46 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"David Webber"   2008-04-09 12:50:56 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-10 14:20:09 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-08 19:54:25 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-09 11:38:03 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-10 14:18:02 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-10 15:05:33 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-10 16:55:12 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-10 19:48:49 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-11 04:41:28 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-11 19:29:13 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-12 11:09:12 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-12 17:01:02 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Tom K." <tk  2008-04-10 13:39:09 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-10 19:50:28 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-10 15:49:54 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-10 16:10:48 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-10 16:57:10 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"David Webber"   2008-04-07 09:09:44 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-08 03:22:49 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"David Webber"   2008-04-08 08:32:50 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-03 12:56:45 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-04 01:07:43 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Neil <nhmiller@[EMAIL   2008-04-03 14:39:09 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
ediebur@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-03 14:51:12 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-04 09:13:39 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-04 08:59:09 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
Danny Schorr <.@[EMAIL  2008-04-05 10:02:40 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-05 06:12:28 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Tom K." <tk  2008-04-05 11:03:54 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-05 16:41:23 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-05 17:14:53 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-05 18:06:02 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-06 08:00:38 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-06 17:28:51 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
ttw6687@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-06 17:52:49 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Tom K." <tk  2008-04-06 22:27:00 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-07 12:15:40 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Steve Latham"   2008-04-08 03:16:02 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-06 21:24:15 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-06 21:39:58 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-06 21:47:48 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
ttw6687@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-07 09:32:28 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
paramucho@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-08 13:58:08 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-07 10:12:38 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-07 10:14:46 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
"Tom K." <tk  2008-04-07 16:10:33 
Re: Unanswered Question #1
LJS <ljschenck@[EMAIL   2008-04-08 07:59:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Sep 5 20:50:10 CDT 2008.