Steve Latham wrote:
>> --------
>> Olny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
>> I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The
>> phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cmabrigde
>> Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are,
the
>> olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit
>> pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a
>> ****belm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
>> istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot
>> slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs psas it on!!
>> --------
>
> One of my colleagues had this posted on his office door. It's actually
> amazing how easy to read this is!
>
> What's funny now, is with texting, things like "pwned" and "teh" are
being
> understood just as easily.
There are surely the same thing going on with other types of conception,
like in music. And in music, it is surely heavily exploited, though one
does not think about it in the same way, since one is not tied with a of
reproducing an exact meaning.
Hans
|
