by "Tom K." <tkorth1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 9, 2008 at 03:24 PM
"Steve Latham" <llatham@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:h0%Uj.1720$5Y1.120@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Danny Schorr" <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:kbd7241s8dkq2u92v2ujblbpv9cg98tabr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> Is that true? I have never qualifiers such as +1.
>>
>> I guess Bach's prelude in E major from the third partita would be +2,
>> since it suggest three separate strands?
>> 1 ( melody) + 2 ... what? Threads?
>> Seems unnecessarily terminological to me.
>> Compound melody seems to be enough to denote what's going on.
>>
>> Danny
>
> "+1" is net speak for "that's another vote for..." - compound melody in
> this case.
>
Steve, from what I've observed, the confusion might have been avoided by
quoting the post which said "compound melody" and then simply saying +1 in
your post.
But then again, this is RMT & without some "confusement" (Prof. Longhair's
wonderful term), where would we be?
Tom K.
