by "Alain Naigeon" <anaigeon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 9, 2008 at 09:48 PM
"Tom K." <tkorth1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a écrit dans le message de news:
2I2dnZw6vdPNObnVnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Steve Latham" <llatham@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:h0%Uj.1720$5Y1.120@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Danny Schorr" <.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:kbd7241s8dkq2u92v2ujblbpv9cg98tabr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>
>>> Is that true? I have never qualifiers such as +1.
>>>
>>> I guess Bach's prelude in E major from the third partita would be +2,
>>> since it suggest three separate strands?
>>> 1 ( melody) + 2 ... what? Threads?
>>> Seems unnecessarily terminological to me.
>>> Compound melody seems to be enough to denote what's going on.
>>>
>>> Danny
>>
>> "+1" is net speak for "that's another vote for..." - compound melody in
>> this case.
>>
>
> Steve, from what I've observed, the confusion might have been avoided by
> quoting the post which said "compound melody" and then simply saying +1
in
> your post.
+1 [ !! :-) ]
--
Français *==> "Musique renaissance" <==* English
midi - facsimiles - ligatures - mensuration
http://anaigeon.free.fr
| http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/anaigeon/
Alain Naigeon - anaigeon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Oberhoffen/Moder, France
